Comparison Workflow

Before and After Load Testing

Before-and-after load testing helps teams prove whether a launch, deploy, or infrastructure change improved or weakened performance.

Start a safe test

Why Before-And-After Testing Works

A single load test can show whether a page or endpoint handled one scenario. A before-and-after test goes further: it shows whether a specific change improved, damaged, or did not affect the user-facing result.

The key is to keep the scenario consistent. If the URL, request method, headers, body, concurrency, request rate, duration, or timeout changes between runs, the reports become harder to compare fairly.

Use The Same Settings

What Changes Matter

Start with correctness. More 500 responses, more 429 responses, or more timeouts usually matter more than a small latency difference. After correctness looks stable, compare p95 and p99 latency to understand whether the slower side of user experience improved or regressed.

Throughput also matters. If requests per second drops while latency rises, the system may be queueing work, waiting on a dependency, or hitting a worker or connection limit.

Example Before-And-After Comparison

Imagine the same API route is tested with 50 requests, 5 requests per second, 3 concurrent users, and a 10-second timeout before and after a deploy.

That result is a regression signal. The endpoint still responds most of the time, but slower tail latency, timeouts, new errors, and lower throughput suggest the deploy should be investigated before more traffic arrives.

Example Decision Rules

Review a sample report or run a controlled comparison from the load test form.